News

Hawley’s SMART Act: A Revolt Against Big Tech

In a day and age, when social media and smart devices are found around every corner, one begins to wonder at what point is it too much. The idea of ever-evolving technology in and of itself is not a bad thing, and as history has shown can prove itself to be quite worthy of our time and attention. However, does it at some point become something more, a hindrance, in fact, to live our best lives?

That is the question Republican Senator Josh Hawley asked as he presented his SMART act a few weeks back that seems to be only the beginning of his revolt against Big Tech. The Social Media Addiction Reduction Technology Act, or SMART Act, would seek to make social media companies such as Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and others from being so addictive.

Hawley and others who back the bill plan to crusade against the “infinite scroll or auto-refill” as well as “badges and other awards linked to engagement.” In this way, users would be less likely to spend so much time on any one platform.

The 14-page measure would also put daily 30-minute time limits on each platform, with a pop-up appearing when that time limit has been reached. It would also require that a report on internet addiction concerning an individual’s free choice be submitted to Congress every three years.

According to Hawley, the youngest member in the Senate, “social media shareholders are investing in… the addiction of users.” He calls out the millions of stories of America’s youth who have become addicted to technology and, in particular, social media during the last few years.

And these addictions can cause some rather severe consequences such as self-esteem issues, severe mental health problems, and numerous hindrances for having any sort of real social life. In addition, Hawley cites the relationship between teen suicide rates and the increasing rate of those with social media equipped smartphones.

The act begins to ask some essential questions about how such technology can impact our lives and how it should be regulated.

However, not everyone agrees that this is the way to do it. Experts in the field of technology addiction, for one, say that the subject is so new to us that it is not fully understood yet, such as what causes it exactly, how prevalent it is, or even if it is a real thing. They argue that enacting government regulations to such an issue is like putting the cart before the horse.

Others argue that, while well-intentioned, the bill is just another form of government control. And coming from a party that is built on less governmental influence, many are critical of it.

The bill is also seen as a beginning of “the revolt” on attention industries such as Big Tech. According to Tim Wu, a tech ethicist, lawyer, and author of The Attention Merchants, a revolt happens when audiences (in this case users) “begin to believe that they are being ill-used – whether overloaded, fooled, tricked, or purposefully manipulated.” He likens Hawley’s attack on Big Tech to the revolt against Parisian posters in the 1860s.

During that time, an artist began putting up brightly colored posters around Paris, and they were well-liked. However, it wasn’t long before other artists followed suit until there were so many posters lining the streets that they were seen as an annoyance and something that cluttered the city.

Groups began to rise up in revolt of the posters, lobbying for regulations to be implemented on where the advertisements could be placed throughout the city. And they eventually won.

Wu incites that a similar act is taking place here with Hawley’s bill being just the start. Whether the bill is signed into law or not, people are beginning to see an overabundance of social media and that it can harm them and their livelihoods. For many, it’s only a matter of time before we see more and more negative effects on our society. And if we aren’t careful, it could easily take over such as those posters did in Paris. To those people, Hawley merely is trying to get a head start on it.

Comments (23)

  1. Someone tell that idiot that if he cannot do something reasonable & worthwhile to go home. We have too attacks on our freedom w/o him adding to it!!!!

  2. My addiction might be my phone but it’s a million times better than addiction to drugs

  3. Internet Usage should not be regulated!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  4. Internet should not be regulated!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  5. Your comparison to the posters in Paris is illegtament because those posters were there in your vision ALL THE TIME! Today’s media must be tuned into, if you don’t tune in you don’see it and it dosen’t bother you!

  6. another idiot wanting to tell us what to do with our lives. it is up to the Parents. damn start teaching your kids,

  7. I support your actions 100%

  8. What nonsense! This gentleman is a Republican? Let’s rename this the DUMB Act and defeat it entirely. Big Brother in motion.

  9. Government control of anything is bad. Government control of social media is especially bad. First amendment rights can be easily violated with this. That SMART bill needs to be defeated.

  10. This should be each person’s own decision, under their own control, NOT controlled by the government or even known by it.

  11. I agree to a point…I am so tired of people sitting in restaurants texting put the phone down and talk to your companion. Dons get me wrong I like my phone and my computer but I am sick and tired of all the spam mails and spam calls I am getting. It is ridiculous.

  12. I too believe that [most] people are spending far too much time on social media and not enough on actual physical engagment. However, we alreay have too many “Big Daddy” laws in America. we need less government, we need real parental engagement in youngsters lives (let them set the boundaries) and we need people to actually govern themselves.
    What we do NOT need are more laws that govern us from wakeup until bed and beyond.

  13. Purchase Amoxicillin No Prescription Order Prednisone Online cialis Zithromax 600mg

  14. I am extremely impressed with your writing skills as
    well as with the layout on your weblog. Is this a paid
    theme or did you customize it yourself? Anyway keep up the
    excellent quality writing, it is rare to see a nice blog like this one
    today.

  15. After checking out a handful of the articles on your website,
    I honestly appreciate your way of writing a blog.
    I book-marked it to my bookmark webpage list and will be checking back in the
    near future. Take a look at my web site as well and let
    me know your opinion.

  16. What i do not realize is actually how you are not really much more neatly-favored than you might be right now.
    You’re so intelligent. You recognize therefore significantly in the case of this topic,
    made me personally imagine it from so many various angles.
    Its like men and women don’t seem to be fascinated unless it’s something
    to accomplish with Girl gaga! Your individual stuffs excellent.
    All the time take care of it up!

  17. Your method of explaining all in this post is truly good, all can effortlessly be
    aware of it, Thanks a lot.

  18. I am genuinely delighted to glance at this blog posts which contains
    tons of useful facts, thanks for providing such information.

  19. Hello just wanted to give you a quick heads up. The text in your content seem to be
    running off the screen in Chrome. I’m not sure if this is a formatting issue
    or something to do with internet browser compatibility but I thought I’d post to let you know.
    The layout look great though! Hope you get the issue resolved soon. Many thanks

  20. Why viewers still use to read news papers when in this technological globe the whole thing is presented on web?

  21. When someone writes an post he/she maintains the thought of a user in his/her
    brain that how a user can know it. Therefore that’s why this article is amazing.

    Thanks!

  22. I am regular visitor, how are you everybody? This post posted
    at this site is genuinely good.

Comment here